|
|
|
2009:
| DATE: |
ENTRY: |
| 07
March |
The
site opened for the season. An area of the field….which has
become smaller since Doug, the landowner sold the south end to
the local garage as a parking area for derelict cars, was top stripped.
The area selected, to the south of the existing trench where
burials 4, 8,9 10, 11, 12 and 13 had been discovered during
recent excavation seasons, was designed to help us locate the
southern extent
of the cemetery. The strategy is to take the ground level
down to the “Roman Burial“ level, in approximately 100mm
layers, recording as we go and hopefully we will find a
perimeter ditch or wall or fence or………….
|
| 25th
April to 30th May ....... |
We started finding Roman window glass….on a
burial site????? |
| 30th
May to 4th July ....... |
More
window glass. Was the site used as a dump for a demolished
villa? Several flint microliths were also fond that show that
the site was in use in some way during the Mesolithic.

Metal finds are few and far
between on the site but a small broken bronze clip and a section
of bronze bracelet were
found. These could have been grave goods but, due to the
apparently low status of the burials, are more likely to have
been casual losses by visitors to the site or to have been
brought in from another site at the same time as the window
glass. |
| 4th
July to 22nd August ..... |
A couple of areas that had shown up as soil
changes were investigated. One of which bore a strong resemblance
to pits (of unknown usage) that had been found by Essex Field
Archaeology unit on a burial site similar to ours in Great Dunmow.
(See Terry B's photograph below) The second ‘feature’ turned
out to be a trench dug by machine in a previous season when Brian
was looking for possible ditches shown on the aerial photograph!!! |
| 22nd
August |
The hard work continued and we ended up with,
thanks to Heidi’s exacting requirements, a rock hard and
beautifully flat area that could have been used as a dance floor
but had produced dramatically little in the way of either finds or
information.
One
nice find during this rather unproductive period was the pebble
that Stuart found which had a hole bored through it and must have
been used as a pendant or small (?loom?) weight. Dating is needed on this
item as it was found in a level that had the Roman window glass
and Mesolithic flints as well as the odd bit of clay pipe!
|
| 5th
September |
This photograph, taken in June before the
area in the foreground had been excavated to what we felt was
‘natural’ (about a further 400mm) shows the section that we
used as an access path to the excavation – the bucket is laying
on this walkway. The depression to the east of the bucket is where P.C. Dave
and Ed had found Burial 14 in 2007.
Having decided that we had exhausted the
possibility of finding a boundary in the southern end of the site
and feeling that at this stage in the season it was too late to
top strip and extend the site even further south….we would also
have had to needed to move a spoil heap and the MAHG trailer… it
was decided that we would tidy the site by excavating the path
area thereby making the whole of the western half
of the area level. Ed had been away in France
for the summer and she maintains that it was her return to the site
that acted as the catalyst and she claims full responsibility for what
happened once this decision had been taken!
Burial 16 was found by P.C. Dave about 1.5m
SW of burial 14. (Photograph taken looking east).
|
| 12th
September |
Just like buses – you wait for ages and
then – THIRTEEN come along together. Yes, that’s right Burial
17 (Dave P.) was found the following week about 1.5m east of
Burial 16 and burial 18 (Heidi) less that 1.5m to the east of
that, which was close to where Burial 4 had been found in 2006.

Burial 17 was “un-urned” but had an
accessory vessel placed
with the bone.

Burial 18 was just cremated bone with no pots
of any description.
|
| 19th
& 26th September |
Stuart found Burial 19 and then P.C. Dave
discovered Burial 20, Stuart increased his score with Burial 21
but P.C. Dave took the lead in the league table with an enormous
vessel for Burial 22. Val entered the competition with Burial 23. |
| 3rd,
19th & 17th October |
Another ‘un-urned’ burial (24) that had
an accessory vessel was found next by P.C. Dave and very close by
was Burial 25, which was again just a deposit of cremated bone. Ed
claimed Burial 26, although Dave P. helped with the excavation and
was responsible for lifting the accessory flask intact.
Burials 27 (badly crushed) and 28
(un-urned
but with a few sherds and a nail associated with it so it may have
been in a wooden box) were claimed by Dave P and Ed.

All the time this excitement had been going
on Terry B had diligently been excavating the strange pit above
and then a colour change noted near Burial 18 and
found….nothing! Better luck next season Terry – although you
did find the only coin. What was it now? Oh yes I remember – a
1964 penny from
Jersey
!

Burial 22 after conservation.
The main vessel and the smaller
pot, (which was found inverted inside the burial urn) had both
been damaged in antiquity by ploughing.

The accessory vessel from Burial 26
with its
proud Father ..............

..... and after
conservation.
The composite photograph below shows the proximity of the burials in the ‘cluster’. When
taking the photographs Ed was standing on the area that will be
excavated in 2010.

|
| 31st
October |
The
final day of the dig. Next season we intend to concentrate on the
area immediately to the north of these burials. Having, so far, failed to find a boundary to the whole
site, (although this is an ongoing aim) we are now interested to
see if this ‘cluster’ has some form of demarcation that may
give a clue as to whether it is a group (family????) that was
buried in a specific
plot. With this aim in
mind it was decided to cover that area of burials with polythene
and a thin covering of earth rather than back filling so that it
would be possible to view the area as a whole at some time in the
future.
As we finished tidying the site a colour
change and a sherd of pot were noticed in the north wall of the
trench so watch this space….
|
| Where possible the burial vessels were
lifted after being encased in plaster bandage and were then
excavated on the ‘desk top’ and the layers/ sections
recorded by plan and photograph. The contents were examined
(and in some cases washed and sieved to separate bone from
soil) before being weighed, bagged and stored. In the future
it may be possible to find the funds to have the bone
analysed. It is at all times important to remember that we are
dealing with human remains and, in spite of the on site
‘competition’, that the burials are accorded appropriate
respect and treatment. |
TOP
BACK TO TOLLESBURY MAIN PAGE
2010:
| DATE: |
ENTRY: |
| 28th
April |
Ed has 'examined' the totally mullered (I believe that to be the
correct archaeological description) remains of Burial 29. Not a
lot left as those on site were probably aware but she has been
able to piece together the majority of the base of the main vessel
so that we have some idea of its original form and size AND also
the base of an accessory vessel....a real chunky monkey of
Roman pot.

Burial 30 is half done as Mike wanted to drool over the ?Samian?
bowl. There is a section of the side and rim missing but the rest
goes together nicely. You may know that the main vessel was
collapsing before it was lifted but Ed’s doing her best to hold
it together while excavating it. The ?Samian? bowl was definitely
a lid as the shoulder of the main vessel had been crushed
underneath it....but strangely at the moment Ed seems to be minus
rim sherds....they may be deeper in the layers yet to be attacked.
The big excitement is that at about 11.00pm last night Ed managed
to remove, intact, a lovely little flask from under the collapsed
shoulder section. It had been tipped on its side, probably when
the dish was crushed in the burial, and the rim is chipped so it's
worth sieving the soil contents to see if any fragments come to
light.... Ed'll bring what she can to the site on Saturday for
everyone to gloat over.
|
| 1st
May |
On the last day
of April 2010 Tollesbury was the scene of the world's heaviest
rainfall in living memory....well that's what it felt like. As a
consequence the site this morning was a quagmire....it also had an
innovative new feature that went well with the tyres that had been
dumped in the western trench extension last week (forgot to
mention those in the last diary entry in my excitement
about the pots). We had a visitation during the week and our
visitors had helpfully excavated chunks of soil from Heidi's
billiard table area. It now looks like a very badly ploughed
field. It was probably bored Tollesbury youth looking for
something to enliven their dull existence so let's hope they felt
that it was more hard work that it was worth.
The team were
carrying on the excavation near Burials 29 and 30 but it was VERY
sticky. An area of bone fragments was located and then, fairly
close to it, a few rim sherds. If the bone is an un-urned burial
it would have been very difficult to lift adequately given the
horrendous digging conditions and so the area was covered with
polythene and lightly backfilled. Hopefully next week will be a
bit drier. Digging then concentrated on removing the next section
of plough soil in order to expose a wider, more 'open area' at the
Roman level.
Update on Burial 30: The lid of the Burial is a
Dragendorff 18. Only a smallish section of the rim and side is
missing and I hope that it may turn out to be the bit we found
last season.....Colin may have it somewhere in the archives.....The dish is very badly abraded and although you can
see that there was a makers mark you cannot read it! The little
accessory vessel (vase or flask) has cleaned up beautifully but
there are a few bits of the rim missing. Talking of pot
rim....Ed didn't find any rim at all for the main vessel. That is
odd as the Dag 18 was still covering at least half of the urn. The
conundrum: Was the pot devoid of rim (i.e. badly broken) before
being used as a container for the ashes? If so it seems a strange
idea to then include a high status Samian lid and a fine ware vase
as grave goods doesn't it?

There are more sherds of the
main vessel ...Ed put these few bits of the base together for the
'group photo'. |
| 11th
May |
Ed spent this
week dismantling and rebuilding the main vessel from burial 30.
The base is so wafty that you cannot align the 'ankle'...is it can
be described as such...very accurately at all and a small mistake
there flung the whole thing out. Ed has a very few very small bits
that she's still trying to find a home for....she's going to
persevere! Still no rim though. In the photo below it is still
only 'tacked' together and the joints still have to be sealed to
hold it firm....at the moment it cannot travel or it would drop to
bits! Hopefully Ed will have time to do that next week.
 |
| 14th
May |
As
Ed told Mike last night, burial 26 (the one with the fine ware
vase/flask beside it) is on Ed's lab bench as we speak. Last night
Ed found vessel glass sherds in it!!!! She started excavating
this one from the bottom as the base was in a poor state. In the
bottom 10mm she found small animal bone and then about 50mm from the
base a sliver of glass. Very thin and tiny and she thought "why
is there Perspex in here????" Then her brain switched on!
There were 4 or five minute slivers and one larger piece compacted
into the bone above a broken section of the side wall of the pot.
Part of the urn wall appears to have been pushed in. Below is a
photo of some of the glass above it and another showing the
lovely large pieces that were exposed when she lifted the broken
section away. The glass is well in the body of the vessel and was
included with the contents - it didn't arrive there afterwards.
Also at about 60mm from the base was a chunk of metal, probably a
nail. ....she's now going back to using a paintbrush, tweezers and
a magnifying glass......
Burial
26 contents, including glass, is shown in the two pictures below.


|
| 22nd May |
Another productive day on
site. It started badly with Stuart and Ed discovering that some of
the local yoof had created a cyclo-cross track across the site.
They had been seen, but they had not been challenged about it????, on
site during the week with spades etc and had obviously put in a
lot of hard work - they'd moved more muck than we normally did
each week! Whilst giving them 10 out of 10 for effort we were not
impressed with the damage so while Stuart started replacing the
spoil on the heaps and tidying up the vertical sections and baulks
I went off to locate the perpetrators. A local 'mole' spilled the
beans and, having interviewed the prime suspect, (who admitted
everything without me having to resort to Guantanamo Bay tactics),
I hope that we will have seen the last of our little bikers.
Having spent
last week getting the next section north nice and level we
proceeded to remove the final layer of soil 'above burial
depth'. It was nice that Doug (the landowner) made it on to site
in his golf buggy just as we had confirmed Burial 31 (Ed) and
Burial 32 (P.C. Dave) and he was able to see them in situ, albeit
from a bit of a distance. Just after he left Heidi increased her
tally by finding number 33. The first two were encased in plaster
and lifted as great lumps but Heidi's was so badly 'ploughed' that
only the bottom section of the burial was still there so the
remaining contents were removed and bagged before the base of the
vessel was lifted. The sherds etc were sent back to the hut for
washing and reconstruction. 31 was lifted with about 2 tons of
soil around it as it was really scattered by the plough and we
were unsure of how much of the pot was left intact. Ed's since had
a chance to excavate the contents and reports that although badly
damaged in antiquity the bottom third of the main vessel can be
reconstructed and we have 3 sherds (1 rim and 2 body) of a
fineware vessel in a black fabric accessory vessel. These were
found in amongst the cremated bone so the pot was definitely
inside the main vessel. There are 3 sherds of a redddish fineware
that may have been associated with the burial but as these were in
the top layer of soil, above the remaining cremated bone, Ed
cannot absolutely state that it was part of burial 31.
Burial 32 is due on the 'lab bench' next. Those
of you who are very observant may have noticed that Ed has not yet
reported on Burial 27 found in October last year. Well, it's
sitting in the storage bay and will get done - but it is such a
horrendous looking lump of a thing that it keeps getting pushed to
the back of the queue! It will get done, honest!
The photograph below shows
how close the latest crop of burials are to each other.

|
| 29th
May |
As
some of you will know we got rained off just after 11.00am but,
exciting stuff, prior to that Stuart had found some nails in the
area immediately north of last season's burial 28.We had decided
that this un-urned burial may have been in a wooden box as one
nail had been found next to the ashes (which disappeared into the
baulk and had to wait until this season). Finding four more nails
seems to confirm the theory. Even better P.C. Dave discovered
burial 34, also un-urned but only managed to lift half of the
cremated bone before rain stopped play. Stuart will finish the job
this coming week as day is not going to come out to play with us.
Having
nothing better to do with the rest of Saturday Ed decided that
there were a couple of burials on the bench that needed her
attention ......
|
| 3rd
June |
Today's
diary entry relates to a report on burials that were lifted late
last season and earlier this year and Ed's just got around to
reporting on them!!! So the burial numbering below relates to 2009
numbering just to clear away any possible confusion .........
Burial
32 was fairly mundane. Large pieces of cremated bone in the bottom
third of a thick 'grey ware' pot. Badly truncated and
disturbed in antiquity, the only thing to report is that it
contained the bones of an adult human!

Burial 31 was also badly
truncated again with only the bottom half in situ. This
time we had a large spread of body and rim sherds adjacent to the
burial which were lifted in a large lump. Originally there had
been a little accessory vessel as there were 3 sherds (1 rim and
two body) of a small black colour coated vessel (Colchester ware?)
in amongst the bone in what remained of the vessel.

Having promised that she'd
get onto Burial 23 ( 26 09 09) Ed finally summoned up the courage
to attack the massive lump that has been occupying half the store
room. PC Dave lifted it with a 'bulge' to the side as he thought
that there was an accessory vessel beside it:

Well he was wrong...... the
lump was just rim sherds and the 'dragged side of the main vessel.
The accessory vessel was inside!!!!!

Badly damaged in antiquity both vessels are packed and ready to go to HQ
with burial 32 etc.
And finally. Ed had been promising herself a bit
of fun with Burial 19 which was her birthday present last
September. Remember it?

This
was a brilliant one for desk top excavation. The bone was in good
condition and the plaster bandage had held the whole thing intact
so it was a dream to work on. Afterwards Ed had a lovely time with
a 3D jigsaw puzzle....
From this:
to
this: 
and
the main vessel has some lovely 'pinched' decoration as well:

Totally
different to any of the other vessels that we've found. |
| 5th
June |
A
lovely day for being down a hole in the ground. We uncovered the
backfilled burial (34) and, whilst Stuart was lifting it, the
deputy site directors deliberated upon it and decided
that we needed to go down at least 100mm deeper over the whole
area as we might be missing more un-urned burials. Needless to say
neither Heidi nor Ed were the most popular archaeologists on site
- it's a big area and it was hot in that there hole in the ground!
They
were, however, totally vindicated as less that 5 minutes into the
new plan Ed found cremated bone traces, followed by:
followed
by ..
Paul
gave Ed a hand to excavate and lift the vessels as she's
notoriously slow...possibly due to all the chatting...and Ed then
carried them off with the cremated bone to do her reporting.
Burial
35 was un-urned bone (adult, human, and a reasonable amount for
one individual), with two accessory vessels....both really
high status. The first exposed is a small jar / beaker in a really
lovely eggshell terra nigra fabric (AD 50 -100 ish) which Ed will
definitely need to reconstruct under the magnifying glass as the
sherds are so delicate.
The
second vessel, which Ed's now reconstructed, as it was,
mercifully, only in 4 sections (although it seems to have
lost its foot ring in antiquity), is a Samian ware Dragendorff
form 33 (early), which is again 1st century. Ed's irreverent son,
Jared, has nicknamed it "The Noodle Bowl"
Whilst
all this excitement was going on Jennifer, back after a few weeks
absence, was quietly finding yet another un-urned burial which
Heidi helped her to lift before Ed could take a photo of it in
situ. This is the next best thing: the hole bone came out of!
As you can see, Burial 36, due
to its higher position, would have been found even if we hadn't
formulated a new 'depth policy' but it's hardly as exciting as
Burial 35...."the one that would have got away"!
|
| 12th
June |
It
was a quiet day, not much by way of finds.
We've gone down to the level where we found the lovely Samian
dish but it looks fairly sterile. Jennifer found a lovely rim and
some bone which we thought could be another burial (?) - this is
on the same level as the burial she found last week. As it
was quite late in the day we covered the area and left it for the
coming week.
Richard
found what looks like exactly the same type of post hole feature
as last week - this one however was a bit lower - it seems as
though he's got three post holes right next to each other. Can
this be true?
Other
than that not much - the odd pot sherd and sliver of glass as well
as a lovely waste flake. |
| 19th
June |
In
spite of the unpleasant conditions we had quite a large turn
out...and we found....Nothing!
Well
that isn't quite true. Richard continued exploring his post
holes...he now has three - very small and very close together.
Then he found a piece of wooden paling - you know the old stuff
that they used for fences years ago, held together by wire. It is
right in the middle of the field and a fence has no right to be
there so we were mystified. Ed has now solved the puzzle, she
thinks... a friend of hers who has been farming the area for more
years than he cares to remember and knows all the local farming
history says that the field has never been divided into sections
but that when King George VI visited the village during WW II
a 'road' was created across the field with the entrance where 42
West Street has since been built, and it carried on to meet Back
Road where the current foot path reaches it. Richard's post holes
are actually in a line with this track-way and the paling could
have been part of the fencing along the edge of it. If anyone has
a better theory let us know! Definitely not Roman but
possibly Royal!
Paul
found a nice flint scraper but unfortunately it was in the
backfill of one of the trenches Brian dug trying to establish
the layout of the ditches on the site so although we know it came
from the area of Brian's trench, as it was opened before the open
area we are working on at the moment and backfilled with the soil
that came out of it, it is not stratified ...still, it is a lovely
little reminder that folk were actually on our site in the
Mesolithic.

View
showing bulb of percussion
View showing retouch work around the edges
Disappointingly
Jennifer's bone scatter and rim sherd turned out to be just that
... a scatter of bone and a stray rim sherd...ah well better luck
next week..... |
| 28
June |
Digging was slow
due to the lack of rain and not much was found by way of finds.
The usual suspects, i.e. clay pipe, roof tile and a few flint
waste flakes.
A
strategy meeting is to be held in the near future as we're running
out of digging space - we had a few new members on site and its
going very well, apart from the cramped quarters. |
| |
|
TOP
BACK TO TOLLESBURY MAIN PAGE
|







|